Advanced Placement (AP) European History Practice Exam

The piece of evidence that Ogilvie does not use to support her argument about the different trajectories of the Commercial Revolution in Württemberg as compared to England and the Netherlands is related to the shopping habits of women, specifically their purchasing of clothing and groceries in the market. While the buying behavior of women could be indicative of market engagement, Ogilvie's analysis primarily focuses on systemic factors that shaped women's economic activities in different regions.

The other options provide substantial contextual support for her argument. For example, the impact of guild restrictions sheds light on how institutional barriers affected women's participation in the economy in Württemberg specifically. Additionally, examining the prevalence of market jobs for women in England and the Netherlands highlights the differing socioeconomic structures and opportunities available to them in contrast to Württemberg. Lastly, local religious institutions playing a role in limiting women’s roles in commerce demonstrates how cultural and religious contexts further influenced economic activities. Each of these pieces of evidence serves to contrast Württemberg's experience with that of other regions, making them more relevant to her argument than the general observation about women's purchasing patterns.